Statewide Planning Initiative Work Groups

Work Group 2B – Assisting Self-Represented Litigants  

Work Group 2B - Final Work Group Report

 

 

Work Group 2B Issue List*

The law and process are complicated and not easily understood. How do we make the current system more accessible and user-friendly and remove barriers that, for some, appear insurmountable?  

In a judicial system that is designed to function best when each party is represented, how do we assure access to justice for self-represented litigants in the administrative hearing process and throughout all levels of the Maine Court system?  

Examples of issues to be considered include:

- Training and support regarding issues affecting low/moderate income people;

- Plain language forms etc.

- Intake, advice, information and referral systems, consolidated statewide intake

- Web-based legal information, online forms, video conferencing and other technology innovations

- The role of Court clerks and state agency staff

- Court assistance offices or self-help centers to provide support for self-represented litigants

- Specific impediments faced by those with limited phone access or transportation, language diversity, distance or disability barriers

- Education and training to overcome bias and inequities and show value of each individual, rapport and capacity building within diverse communities to reduce barriers

- Education on so many levels – internet, audio, video, churches/temples/mosques youths and seniors

- Take justice out to the people in their own environments

- Mandated continuing education on diversity issues

- Educate self-represented litigants about what to expect regarding services, what they can gain, problems they will face, etc.

- Put resources into ombudsman, mediation and arbitration, expanded ADR with a focus to accommodate the interests of low-income Mainers

- Increased utilization of properly trained, educated and supervised non-lawyer  participation

- Expand small claims court model

- Best practices for state and local administrative agencies, analysis and report on state agency procedures

- New roles for lay advocates in the court system, increased utilization of properly trained, educated and supervised non-lawyer participation, volunteer screeners at courthouses

- Eliminating rules of evidence in non-jury trials involving self-represented litigants  

*These issues will be split between Work Group 2A and 2B.

 

Information/Resources

ABA Coalition for Justice Survey Summaries - The American Bar Association's Coalition for Justice supports justice system reform at the state and local levels and urges that such efforts involve the community along with judges and lawyers.  The Coalition thus conducts surveys of state supreme courts, state and local bar associations, and, beginning in 2001, a selection of metropolitan trial courts.  Click here for the link.

Pro Se Information

A Study Concerning Maine's Present and Possible Future Responses to the Pro Se Question, Stacy O. Stitham, April 25,2005, (J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School, 2005)

Pro Se Statistics, Madelynn Herman, National Center for State Courts, June 21, 2006

This links to a list of online reports regarding pro se litigants and provides a snapshot of statistics in various jurisdictions from around the country.  

Selfhelpsupport.org is an SJI funded, award winning membership site that serves as a network for practitioners of self-help programs as well as an online clearinghouse of information relating to self-representation, www.Selfhelpsupport.org.

Center for Court Solutions - http://solutions.ncsconline.org/key_topics/pro_se_pro_bono.htm - PRO SE/PRO BONO SERVICES - This link provides information, resources, and solutions to respond to the increasing numbers of pro se litigants seeking effective access to the courts. Covered topics include unbundling private legal services, expanding pro bono pools, simplifying court processes and procedures, and self-help centers.

 

 

State and Local Task Forces on Self-Represented Litigants:  Such task forces are in place in many jurisdictions, and are playing a major role in spearheading innovation.  High judicial involvement or support is critical.

 Self-Represented Litigant Strategic Plan:  Such task forces find that a multi-component strategic plan assists in maintaining focus and building consensus.  Such a plan also facilities ongoing self-evaluation.

 

The survey tool used by the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission to survey Arkansas court clerks Survey of Arkansas Court Clerks Regarding Self-Represented Litigants (11/1/05)

 

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

 

Court Connected Alternative Dispute Resolution in Maine, Honorable Howard H. Dana Jr., Maine Law Review, Vol. 57:2 Click here for Article     

 

National Standards for Court-Connected Mediation Programs, Center for Dispute Resolution, The Institute for Judicial Administration Click here for Article

 

MONITORING AND EVALUATING COURT-BASED DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAMS: A GUIDE FOR JUDGES AND COURT MANAGERS, National Center for State Courts Click here for Article

 

ABA Section of Dispute Resolution, Resolution on Mediation and the Unauthorized Practice of Law  - Adopted by the Section on February 2, 2002 Click here for Resolution

Bibliographic Summary of Cost, Pace, and Satisfaction Studies of Court-Related Mediation Programs, Jennifer E. Shack, Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems Click here for Bibliography

Supreme Court Complementary Dispute Resolution Committee, Final Report of the Evaluation of the Pilot Program for Mediation of Economic Aspects of Family Law Cases Click here for Report

Resources on Self Represented Litigation - These materials have been prepared by the Self Represented Litigation Network.  They include a listing of key resources, a description of the Network, and a listing of effective practices.

Websites and Key Materials

www.selfhelpsupport.org  The main national source of information on self represented litigation, the site includes over 1,000 resources, and has 1400 members.  Operated by NCSC on behalf of a consortium of groups, with funding from SJI.

The Future of Self Represented Litigation, Report From the March 2005 Summit , National Center for State Courts (2005).  Includes effective practices, ideas for dissemination and future innovations, and several important papers on the state of knowledge and planning for the future.  (Available at http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_ProSe_FutSelfRepLitfinalPub.pdf).

Framing the Issues for the Summit on the Future of Self-Represented Litigation, John Greacen, (2005) included in the above Report.  This paper, prepared for the Summit , includes the best summary of the current state of research knowledge on self represented litigants and their needs.

Reaching Out or Overreaching: Judicial Ethics and Self Represented Litigants, Cynthia Grey, American Judicature Society, (2005).  A report and model curriculum on the role of judges.  (Available at http://ajs.org/prose/pdfs/Pro%20se%20litigants%20final.pdf).

Meeting the Challenge of Pro Se Litigation: A Report and Guidebook for Judges and Court Managers, Jona Goldschmidt et al, American Judicature Society, (1999)  Prepared for the seminal 1999 conference.  (Available at www.selfhelpsupport.org).  See also, Meeting the Pro Se Challenge: an Update, Kathleen M. Sampson,  84 Judicature 326 (May-June 2001) (Available at http://ajs.org/prose/pro_sampson.asp).

The Self Help Friendly Court :  Designed from the Ground Up to Work for People Without Lawyers, Richard Zorza, National Center for State Courts (2002).  A long term vision. (available at http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_ProSe_SelfHelpFriendlyCtPub.pdf)

Additional information may be located by contacting: Richard Zorza, richard@zorza.net, 202-549-1128

Public Information, Training and Assistance Programs

Courthouse Concierge Desk:  A staffed courthouse concierge desk service provides welcoming and directing services to all who enter the courthouse.  This service is frequently staffed by volunteers and can provide additional assistance services.  The service fundamentally changes the face of the court to the world.

Self-Help Websites:  Well designed and comprehensive self-help websites have proven themselves to be highly effective means of providing the information component of access to justice.  After initial development costs, they can distribute information widely with little marginal cost other than ongoing updates and maintenance.  They facilitate partnerships with appropriate access points.

Self-Help Centers:  Self-help centers have proved themselves as highly effective at increasing litigant satisfaction, helping litigants prepare for court, and may improve court functioning.  They consist of programs in which court staff and others provide information on a one-on-one basis or in workshops about court procedures and the law.  While not providing formal advice, and while not involving the creation of attorney-client relationships, their ability to deal one-on-one with litigants goes way beyond the provision of general information.

Law Library as Resource Center :  Law libraries have become major sources of assistance and support to self-represented litigants.  The staff are often expert in finding the law, and can assist litigants in using tools to find and understand the law.

Multi-Lingual Written Informational Materials:  A disciplined program to produce a full range of needed general descriptive information materials is a crucial component of any general access to justice program.  Such information can be distributed through a wide variety of technologies, makes possible the effective use of volunteers, and helps force consistency on the court itself.  They should be multi-lingual and include community resource listings.

Videos/PowerPoint Slides:  Many programs find that video and PowerPoint training materials are helpful in establishing and maintaining low marginal cost court preparation programs.  These materials can show what court is like, introduce the court players, lessen intimidation, and introduce key legal concepts.  They are particularly appropriate for those populations for whom written materials are less effective.  PowerPoint presentations are less expensive to produce and can be changed more easily than video formats.

Rules in Support of Court Information Programs:  Many jurisdictions that create court-based self help programs have found that it is helpful to enact rules that clarify the precise responsibilities of the staff of these programs.

Community Outreach and Access Programs

Library and Community Access Points:  Experience has made clear that many of the materials and programs developed in the court or legal aid context can more flexibly be accessed by many individuals in environments in which there are supportive individuals.  Sometimes the issue is simply one of physical access, sometimes of help with the computer, sometimes language, sometimes understanding.  A wide variety of community access points can help meet this need, and provide significant leveraging use of materials and on-line information already developed.

Workshops and Training:  Group help programs, often combined with individual support, have proved a cost effective way of walking individuals through complex paper procedures, and preparing them for relatively simple court proceedings.  The design of these programs varies widely, from a simple general presentation, to a multi-part series that includes line by line support for filing in forms and preparing testimony.

Mobile Self-Help Centers:  A mobile self-help center has proved an effective, although expensive, way of communicating the commitment of a court to community outreach.  Carrying materials and staff support to a wide variety of organizations and locations, the message of openness is clear.  It allows programs to serve communities that are physically distant from the court.

Gateway Services in Support of Case Starting / Responding  

Initial Assessment Processes:  Initial assessments are increasingly coming to being seen as critical to effective delivery of services.  Current models are supported by referral resources at self-help centers.

One-on-One Assistance:  More experienced self-help centers are using staff and pro bono attorneys to provide more intensive one-on-one assistance.  While falling within the limitations governing the particular person providing the help, they are of more assistance than group or counter-based service delivery.

Additional Gateway Services

Forms and Documents:  Simple, easy to use and self-help friendly forms and documents are indispensable for an access to justice environment.  Such forms and documents facilitate entry into the dispute resolution system, provide better data to decision makers, speed the overall process, and increase comprehension of the whole system.

Document Assembly Software:  The core concept of document assembly is software that walks users through branching questions to complete forms which are then printed out or filed electronically.  Among the advantages are the ability to provide support as people complete the forms, avoidance of repetitive information, and focus on the areas of information needed.

Customer-friendly Electronic Filing:  Electronic filing, if correctly implemented, can make it easier for litigants to file pleadings and obtain access to justice.  To obtain that result, the electronic filing system must be designed from the ground up for ease of use by lay litigants.  A poorly designed system may increase rather then reduce barriers to access.  It is noteworthy that most of the state-level electronic filing initiatives that are succeeding are access-oriented systems.

Rules in Support of Form and Process Standardization:  There is broad agreement that standardization of forms across a jurisdiction is a critical first step in opening the system to those without lawyers.  Such standardization makes software and form design investment possible, raises the overall level, allows for instructional information, and facilitates training and program support.

 

Courtroom Practices  

Attorneys available to assist / expedite:  A courtroom based screening and support program, in which attorneys review the cases of each self-represented person before they appear, can help build a good collaboration between the court and the self-help or legal aid program, and facilitate the functioning of the court.

Self-represented litigant-friendly judicial practices:  There is increasing understanding that a truly self help friendly court must change not only the processes that lead up to the courtroom, but also the way the courtroom itself is conducted.  Judicial officers and those that work with them are beginning to think of ways to manage the courtroom so that neutrality is enhanced by making the systems work for all, regardless of whether they have a lawyer.

Immediate written order upon decision:  There is emerging agreement that for those without lawyers, it is better if, whenever possible, there is an immediate decision, in writing at the end of the hearing.  This makes it easier for the parties to accept finality, and obtain the services they may need for the next step.

 

Self Represented Litigants: Characteristics, Needs and Services--The Result of Two Surveys December 2005 report from New York ’s Office of the Deputy Administrative Judge for Justice Initiatives on self represented litigants in the New York City Family Court and the New York City Housing Court . ( 12/15/05 )

Ohio Supreme Court Task Force on Pro Se and Indigent Defendants issues Report and Recommendations relating to indigent criminal defense, pro bono, pro se, limited representation and funding for both civil and criminal representation. ( 5/1/06 )

ABA Pro Se/Unbundling Resource Center Updated
The Delivery Committee's Resource Center provides information to policy-makers charged with the task of advancing the response to pro se litigation. The center includes reports, articles, books, cases, ethics opinions and self-service sites in its effort to serve as an online technical assistance resource to bar leaders, the judiciary and court administrators.

Judicial Support Approaches

Materials in Support of Self-represented litigant-friendly judicial practices:  Judges need materials and scripts that will help them develop personal styles that are consistent with their judicial approach, but supportive of access for those without lawyers.

Ethical Rules in Support Self-represented litigant-friendly judicial practices:  Judges similarly need clear authorization in governing ethical rules that they can engage in a non-prejudicial way with self represented litigants in order to ensure that all sides are heard.

Curriculum and Trainings in Support Self-represented litigant-friendly judicial practices:  Judges similarly need clear curriculum and trainings in support of this approach.

 

Post-Order Practices

Enforcement Support:  Many programs agree that they have been better at giving people information at the beginning of the case than they have been at helping them at the end.  They are beginning to explore the creation of programs focused on support for enforcement of already issued orders.  This will increase overall compliance and satisfaction with the court.

Low-Income People and Courts Benefit From New Temporary Restraining Order Clinic Run by Bay Area Legal Aid
The process for seeking restraining orders will be easier for low-income people with the opening of the first temporary restraining order clinic in San Mateo County, California on March 14, 2005.  Run by LSC grantee Bay Area Legal Aid, the clinic will offer workshops to help people handle the necessary paper work for obtaining a temporary restraining order and a hearing for a permanent order protecting them from abusive family members or partners.  Before this new clinic opened, the court handled applications for four to eight temporary restraining orders daily, and those seeking help from the court often found the bureaucracy challenging.  Jennifer Keith, a managing attorney at Bay Area Legal Aid, notes that while attorneys will not actually represent people, “Ideally, if someone comes to our morning workshop, they should leave with a temporary restraining order and a hearing date three weeks out for a decision on the final order.”  Josh Wein, Legal Aid Group Expands Presence on Peninsula, San Francisco Examiner, March 4, 2005 , page reference unavailable.  

Wisconsin Website for Self-representation in Divorce or Legal Separation 
Self-help family Web site
-
This site provides a guide to divorce and legal separation in Wisconsin and takes you through a series of questions, filling in the forms necessary to start or finalize such an action. There is also information about whether you should try to proceed without an attorney and answers to questions you may have about the process.
Go to self-help family Web site
.

National Conference on Community Based Access to Justice

Volunteers, Partners, and Technology - Pro Se Resource Links

Pro Se Programs/Models Using Partnerships & Technology:

CourtMobile – Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Serves to outreach and provide legal information and resources to self-represented litigants in Santa Clara County.  It is a wheelchair accessible van that travels to community locations throughout the county. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030172&ImageId=4

Centro de Recursos Legales – Superior Court of California, County of Fresno
A Spanish legal resource center that provides legal information to Spanish speaking self-represented litigants throughout Fresno County while addressing language barriers that prevent the accessibility of justice. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030174&ImageId=4

Regional Self-Help Center – Superior Court of California, County of Butte
Collaborative effort between Butte, Glenn, and Tehama Counties to provide legal information and court documents to self-represented litigants in all three counties.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030179&ImageId=4

Mobile Law Units – Georgia Legal Services Program, Atlanta Legal Aid Society
Collaborative project that seeks to make available legal services and information to hard-to-reach clients in isolate low-income communities while empowering these groups to address their own legal problems. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030052&ImageId=4

Online Domestic Violence Protection Project – Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services
Web-based resource for DV victims where they can electronically access crucial resources, develop safety plans, and file judicial orders through a centralized website. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030085&ImageId=4

Proyecto Ayuda Legal – Inland Counties Legal Services
A partnership project that provides assistance in family law, landlord-tenant matters, and in select guardianship cases to monolingual Spanish speakers. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030087&ImageId=4

Riverside County Family Law Access Partnership Project – Inland Counties Legal Services A partnership project that provides assistance in a full range of family law cases to Spanish-speaking self-represented litigants. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030086&ImageId=4

Pro Se Computer Workstations – Micronesian Legal Services
Seeks to increase knowledge of legal rights and make users more comfortable with technology by providing access to desktop and laptop computers for self-represented litigants in offices of MLS – the first of its kind in Micronesia. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030040&ImageId=4

3D Multimedia Project – Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation
Enhances functionality of statewide websites by providing interactive audio and video supported legal information to users. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030032&ImageId=4

Assisted Pro Se Website Project – Utah Legal Services
Online resource that allows volunteer attorneys to assist self-represented litigants in no fault divorce matters. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030029&ImageId=4

“Access to Justice” – NWLS Televised Productions, Northwestern Legal Services
A half-hour television program produced and directed by NWLS that addresses a wide range of legal issues faced by the client community such as family law, legal services, and community outreach.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030002&ImageId=4

Know Your Rights Advisory Clinics – Queens Legal Services Corporation
Provides training sessions that advise clients on basic rights and issues that arise in court proceedings involving housing and child support. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=030011&ImageId=4

Self-Help Legal Access Centers – Superior Court of California, Ventura County
Provides legal and research assistance to litigants who cannot afford an attorney using computer workstations, videos, and other proactive and innovative efforts. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020113&ImageId=4

Pro Se Clinic – Neighborhood Legal Services Association
NLSA staff members present a summary of custody law and procedure to advise clients in Pennsylvania on how to proceed and file their cases to court. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020001&ImageId=4

Pro Se Assistance Project – Nevada Legal Services
Two self-help centers in Nevada that provide assistance in the areas of housing and family law. Clients are assisted in understanding and filling out forms filed in court.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020004&ImageId=4

Self-Service Legal Center – Indiana Supreme Court
Online, statewide resource that provides legal information, court forms, and various resources to self-represented litigants in Indiana. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020014&ImageId=4

Web-based Kiosk Initiative – DNA-Peoples Legal Services
Computer kiosks installed throughout the Navajo and Hopi nations to provide access to the Internet.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020015&ImageId=4

Self-Help Legal Access Center – Neighborhood Legal Services
Legal access centers throughout Los Angeles County that provide high-quality legal support and information to self-represented litigants.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020079&ImageId=4

Website Outreach/Legal Self-Help Stations – Legal Aid Bureau
Outreach sites equipped with computer stations, legal self-help material, technical support, and trained local staff to assist clients in accessing legal information.  http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Projects&abstractid=020059&ImageId=4

I-CAN! Earned Income Tax Credit – Legal Aid Society of Orange County
A simple way for low-income workers to file their taxes online and to claim their EITC refund.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Self%20Help&abstractid=020108&ImageID=5

Interactive Community Assistance Network (I-CAN!) Project – Legal Aid of Orange County Kiosk and web-based program that provides legal assistance to pro se litigants in preparing their cases for court. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Self%20Help&abstractid=020009&ImageID=5

Self-Help Offices – AARP Legal Counsel for the Elderly
Offices that provide legal information and support for low-income older persons using a website and volunteers to help them resolve their legal disputes and claim public benefits.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Self%20Help&abstractid=020047&ImageID=5

Internet Access Project – Iowa Legal Aid
Aims to expand technology access and knowledge to low-income persons.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Self%20Help&abstractid=020096&ImageID=5

More Web-based Projects:

Maryland Multilingual Gateway
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=030197&ImageID=5

Bilingual Statewide Website – Oregon Legal Services Community 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=030092&ImageID=5

Multilingual Website and Intake Hotline – Pine Tree Legal Assistance
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=030077&ImageID=5

Online Domestic Violence Protection Project – Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=030085&ImageID=5

Customized Census Data for Community Use – Greater Upstate Law Project
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020099&ImageID=5

LiveJustice – Legal Assistance Corporation of Central Massachusetts  
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020088&ImageID=5

Fair Hearing Bank – Greater Upstate Law Project 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020090&ImageID=5

Ohio Domestic Violence Resource Center – Ohio State Legal Services Association
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020013&ImageID=5

LawHelp Website – Legal Services for New York City   http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020008&ImageID=5

Lay Legal Content on Georgia’s Statewide Website – Atlanta Legal Aid Society, Georgia LSP http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020038&ImageID=5

Statewide Websites – Legal Services Corporation  http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020048&ImageID=5

Changing the Face of Legal Practice: “Unbundled” Legal Services – Maryland Legal Assistance Network
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Web%20Projects&abstractid=020074&ImageID=5

Other Projects:

Closing the Digital Divide – Neighborhood Legal Services Program 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=030103&ImageID=5

Client Education Materials and Communications with Visually Impaired, Blind, and Low- Literacy Clients – West Virginia Senior Legal Aid  http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=030165&ImageID=5

Client Education Materials for Blind or Visually Impaired Clients – Pine Tree Legal Assistance 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=030133&ImageID=5

Work-Study Students as Technology or Support Staff – Indiana Legal Services  http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=030012&ImageID=5

Email Listservs as Electronic Hallways – Legal Services of Northern California
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020116&ImageID=5

LegalMeetings – Lone Star Legal Aid 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020107&ImageID=5

Dynamic Client Information Services – Legal Aid Society of Hawaii
 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020109&ImageID=5

Videoconferencing Project – Legal Aid Society of Hawaii  
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020105&ImageID=5

Videoconferencing Project – Montana Legal Services Association 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020040&ImageID=5

The Virtual Office: Technology Enables the Practice Area Delivery System – Texas Rural Legal Aid
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=technology&level2=Projects&abstractid=020075&ImageID=5

Pro Se Articles, Publications, Standards & Policy:

Access Protocol – Judicial Council of California
Access to Justice is the first of six priorities established by the Judicial Council. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Policy&abstractid=030137&ImageId=4

The – Richard Zorza
Explores ways to redesign courts to make them friendly to and meet the needs of self-represented litigants.
  http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Articles%20and%20Publications&abstractid=030111&ImageId=4

Judicial Techniques for Cases Involving Self-Represented Litigants – Rebecca A. Albrecht, Bonnie Rose Hough, and Richard Zorza
Provides suggestions and guidelines on how to make court processes easier to understand and more accessible to pro se litigants. http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Articles%20and%20Publications&abstractid=030074&ImageId=4

Self Represented Litigants and Court and Legal Services Responses to their Needs: What We Know – John M. Greacen
Compiles a number of pro se studies to evaluate how self-represented litigants have impacted courts and legal services.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Pro%20Se&level2=Articles%20and%20Publications&abstractid=020045&ImageId=4

Access to Justice Technology Bill of Rights – Washington State
Ensures that technological advancements serve to expand access to the justice system rather than forming barriers that hinder access to low-income and underserved people.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Standards&abstractid=020054&ImageID=5

Uses of Technology in Centralized Telephone Intake and Delivery Systems – Legal Services Corporation
Looks at five programs in 1996 that utilize centralized telephone intake and delivery systems while providing examples on how programs can apply technology.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Manuals&abstractid=020065&ImageID=5

Statewide Technology Planning in Legal Services: Turns Out It Is Rocket Science – National Technology Assistance Project
Provides practice guidance on how to implement and maintain a successful statewide technology planning process. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Publications&abstractid=040006&ImageID=5

Improving Legal Services to Rural and Regional Areas Using Technology – John Hodgins, Legal Aid Queensland
Explores how call centres (hotlines), information kiosks, websites, and videoconferencing are enhancing the delivery of legal services to isolated areas in Queensland, Australia. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Publications&abstractid=020110&ImageID=5

Equal Justice and the Digital Revolution: Using Technology to Meet the Needs of Low- Income People – Julia Gordon
Describes how technology has improved program management and increased access to legal assistance and information. 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Publications&abstractid=020094&ImageID=5

Technology and Client Community Access to Legal Services: Suggestive Scenarios on Community Legal Education, Intake, and Referral and Pro Se – Michael Genz
Demonstrates how technology could enhance community access to legal services.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/abstract.asp?level1=Technology&level2=Publications&abstractid=020024&ImageID=5

Grants and Funding Sources:

10 Tips for Funding Technology - TechSoup 
http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articlepage.cfm?ArticleId=538&cg=searchterms&sg=funding%20technology

Technology Initiative Grant Program: How to apply, Milestone reporting, Conference materials, Notices, and Reports
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/sitepages/tech/tech_tig.htm

Technology Initiative Grant Program: Status Report (Evaluation) 
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/abstracts/030066/032403_TIGrprtf.pdf   http://www.lri.lsc.gov/sitepages/tech/tech_eval_clientweb.htm

Other General Sites of Interest:

Access to Justice: Meeting the Needs of Self-Represented Litigants
Collaborative project between Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology, and the National  Center for State Courts to bring together the most advanced process design technologies to assist self-represented litigants.
http://www.judgelink.org/a2j/index.cfm

Legal Services Corporation Resource Library
Online compilation of innovative practices provided by the legal services community throughout the nation – provides excellent links to pro se and technology resources.
http://www.lri.lsc.gov/index.htm

Legal Services Technology Cabin
Website providing technology information for the poverty law community.
  http://www.lstech.org/TIG

Maryland ’s Peoples Law Library
Online compendium of legal and self-help information on Maryland and federal law affecting low and moderate income people.
http://www.peoples-law.info/Home/PublicWeb

Pro Bono Net Self-Help Practitioners Resource Center
Comprehensive online support for courts, community, and legal aid self-help providers and practitioners.
http://www.selfhelpsupport.org

Pro Se Forum – American Judicature Society
Forum with resources and links on pro se issues.

http://www.ajs.org/prose/home.asp

The Pro Se Law Center
Online resource center for legal services providers focusing on pro se clients. 
http://www.pro-selaw.org/pro-selaw/index.asp

Pro Bono Net Self-Help Practitioners Resource Center
Comprehensive online support for courts, community, and legal aid self-help providers and practitioners.
http://www.selfhelpsupport.org

Public Interest Clearinghouse & Legal Aid Association of California
Public Interest Law resources, publications, training programs, and evaluation tools.

http://www.pic.org/

    

Back to JAG Home Page - Work Group 2B