|
Crisis Intervention, Group 1 |
Total |
Court |
Lawyer |
Other |
|
Create a seamless web of resources: |
|
|
|
|
|
211 & education about resources |
13 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
|
Provide web-based resources |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Communication between providers |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Courthouse electronic portal/law libraries |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Relationship building between providers |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Build in mechanisms for collaboration |
8 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
|
DV projects should have access to lawyers |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Identify areas for early intervention programs |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Create collaborations that allow professionals to do what
they're trained to do |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Create a physical facility for collaborations |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
Collaborate in seminar setting: LS/HS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Publish newsletter w/articles about what organizations are
doing |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources: |
|
|
|
|
|
Prioritize existing resource |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Develop aggressive, deliberate pr campaign about the worth
of all humans |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Identify presently existing but untapped resources |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Expand DV courts thruout State (and models like) |
11 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
|
Greater use of volunteers |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Friendly, Group 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Access to interpreters |
10 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
Safety in courthouses |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Educate community & legal providers about resources |
5 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Understand assumptions people come into legal system with
and address |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Provide reasonable accommodations to disabled |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
"Pep rally" for self-empowerment, help people
take care of things themselves |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Continue to clarify language in court forms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Reduce fees (or eliminate) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Provide more ADR opportunities |
15 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
|
Courts develop resource center approach to consumers;
hotline/website |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Courthouse projects: lawyer in every courthouse to provide
information on process & options; help with forms |
6 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
Reduce access problems particularly at hearing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Need people to people service |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Train people to work w/attorneys in courthouse projects |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Working well: Pine Tree's web site, HelpMELaw |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Look for information from other states: Maryland and John
Tull |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Physical access to courthouse: Alpha One has done some
assessments |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Disability etiquette: training/education for judges/court
staff |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Diversity etiquette |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Information sharing & opportunities for outreach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Education/Information on resources for juveniles |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Treat juvenile issues holistically |
8 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
|
Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Education on so many levels: internet, audio, video,
churches/temples/mosques, youth & seniors |
21 |
3 |
13 |
5 |
|
Fund the court system |
20 |
4 |
14 |
2 |
|
"Pep rally" for courts and bar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
De-emphasize role big $$ and lawyers play: comes from
media; comes from lawyers |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Collaborate w/institutions to facilitate outreach &
education |
6 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
Compile all of the resources for all ways of problem
solving & make available to all intake providers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Works great Maine Consumer Law Guide |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Legal advocates in different contexts, I.e. in health care
facility, work w/other professionals; Kids Law Project |
22 |
2 |
13 |
7 |
|
Provide greater access to GALS |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Expand case management to other areas of law |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
"No wrong door" project through DHHS &
Muskie School: partner w/them |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Address literacy concerns w/accessing legal materials,
esp.
for self-help |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
211 line available for health/legal social serves; develop
equivalent for legal profession, direct where to go |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Talk to Legislature & gov. @ funding: advocate for
Judicial Branch & Legal Services as funding priorities |
20 |
4 |
9 |
7 |
|
Look at funding from systemic point of view |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promoting Innovation, Group 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outreach to faith communities to do cross training |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
Rapport building & capacity building within diverse
communities to reduce barriers |
12 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
|
Target first responders & social workers & faith
leaders for education |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
Reinvigorate county bar associations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Loan forgiveness program to put lawyers in rural areas |
20 |
2 |
12 |
6 |
|
Statewide for-profit legal clinic system |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Voucher system |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Law Mobile: rural |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Take justice out to people in their environments |
9 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
|
Community dispute resolution center |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Shifting public thought about value of a win |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Public service advertising to educate public |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Use of public access channels to educate public |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Develop a pool of lay or community educators/leaders in
different communities |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
|
Make legislative law library accessible -- web access |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Legal form organization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Expansion of small claims court |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
How to build advocate pool; first agree on what an
advocate is, if not a lawyer (e.g. CASA) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Create a system of trained para-professionals |
6 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
"Boundary spanners" |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Adopt a family court model that is more like drug court |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Mandate continuing education courses on diversity issues |
15 |
2 |
7 |
6 |
|
Mandate pro-bono work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Develop formal feedback group from legal community to
areas where litigation is being generated |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Preventive lawyering |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Public access rule book in every courthouse |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Resource & answer book for legal services
provider/counter to 211 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
Provide exemption from UPL laws for LRIS;
"bless" other methods of providing legal advice |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
Utilize law schools for experimentation & innovative
ideas/projects |
11 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
|
Pro bono services at law libraries |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Increase opportunities for conversation &
collaboration between legal system & comty sevice providers |
10 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
|
Annual community meetings to continue dialogue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Se, Group 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluate where pro se is/is not appropriate (case types,
types of litigants & their capacities |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Mandatory first appearance -- review case, mediation
options, explain system. (NH pilot project in Family Court) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Group outreach to non-English speakers information about
rights, responsibilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
"Advocacy Institute" : train CAP agencies, Head
Start, family agencies about resources -- potential lay advocates --
resolve issues before they become legal problems |
26 |
0 |
11 |
15 |
|
CLE around poverty issues & where unbundling might
work & also skills to provide unbundled services pro bono to (CLEs
e.g. Women Lawyers Lawyer of Day for PFAs) |
4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
Educate pro ses about what to expect,services, what they
can gain, problems they will face |
9 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
|
Screening process at courthouse and/or earlier |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Clarify the distinction between information & advice.
Info-only lawyers & clerks & others can be very
helpful w/o giving advice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Eliminate Rules of Evidence where both parties are pro se;
allow judge to be more aggressive in seeking facts [chart notes that
"many people strongly against"] |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rule: 2 lawyers or no
lawyer [chart notes that "many people strongly against"] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Written protocols for judges handling pro se cases or
training |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Best practices & education for admin agencies &
move over to court |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Plain English forms, in proceedings, laws |
4 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
|
Self help center: info vide[sic] document assembly,
lawyers who work "by the minute" on an unbundled way |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
Establish time limits for different types of cases |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Evaluate whether: pro se as it currently works is working:
how many people going pro se; how well do they need [sic]; how can we
address problem; cost of addressing problem |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making Institutional Changes to Enhance Access to Justice,
Group 5 |
|
|
|
Increase of non-lawyer participation properly trained
& educated can be utilized |
16 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
|
Goal II Mandate a set number of pro bono legal work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Challenge the big firms in Maine to empower their
associates to do more pro bono work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Working with other licensed professional w/in the state to
provide pro bono services |
6 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
|
Create a multi-disciplinary court annexed team (model in
Maine Drug Court) |
7 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
|
Utilizing & expanding on the "211" system to
increase access to centralized intake system supported by professionally
trained staff |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Educational curriculum requirement; traveling adult
"know your rights" clinic |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Additional rule changes to encourage lawyer participation
to sustain outreach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Explaining legal rights in plain language & culturally
appropriate places |
6 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
Expand concept of court appointed counsel in civil cases
& misdemeanor criminal cases |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Increase C4 funding -- lobbying dollars, persuade
professional lobbyists to take pro bono cases |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Remove restrictions from legal services organizations
related to lobbying & other legal advocacy |
14 |
1 |
9 |
4 |
|
Develop better/more materials on legal matters/process |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Non-adversarial approach to resolving conflict |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Two tiered resolution process: 1) non-adversarial, if it
doesn't work then 2) adversarial |
6 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|
Find way to level playing field, take away imbalance of
power |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Reallocate expenses: the process & procedure IS
THE BARRIER! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Goal = avoid litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Court appointed lawyer for all civil cases (both Grp 5s) |
20 |
4 |
13 |
3 |
|
Voucher system to replace court appointed attorneys
(choice of lawyer) (Appeared in both Group 5s) |
22 |
2 |
12 |
8 |
|
Make ADA access a mainstream priority thru funding/required
upgrades (physical access), language issues (improve accessible
communications) |
5 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
Education & training to overcome bias & inequities
& show value of each individual: disability,$, poverty, language
diversity, cultural differences. Both Grp 5s |
25 |
0 |
11 |
14 |
|
Identify root causes of bias: intentional vs.
unintentional bias discuss ways to eliminate bias, train staff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Economic issues: re-evaluate priorities: raise wages for
legal services attorneys & social worker agency staff; tax benefits
for pro bono work (legal firms); change the culture statewide, region wide
& nationwide re: pay rates for legal services organizations |
16 |
1 |
13 |
2 |
|
Better identify & agree how to commit limited
resources |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
More funding from state for assisting low income litigants |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Develop a holistic approach to helping litigants/low
income/users of legal court system [sic] |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Remove dehumanization feel of courts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Create an effective pre-hearing process |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Evaluate administrative hearing process |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Put resources into: ombudsman, mediation, arbitration |
12 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
Resolve matters without hearing/litigation * make this a
priority in our system!!!: more personal system, less expensive, quicker
resolution, less wait time |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Remove perception that administrative process/hearings are
part of state gov't and therefore a conflict, biased |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Networking & strategizing w/other "networks"
law schools/service organizations |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Advanced legal representation when case is more advanced.
(Appeared in both Group 5s) |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Incentives to get/keep pro bono lawyers & p.b. work |
20 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
|
Communication btwn pvt bar & VLP to know who has
time/expertise to handle cases |
|
Move toward non-litigation resolutions |
11 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
|
Where & who to train [re diversity]: law schools,
lawyers, court staff, service providers |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Pro bono requirements? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Value & respect ALL
people in system: litigants, attorneys, judiciary, agency representatives |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Change expectations of litigants & attorneys: of
outcome, of attorneys, of clients |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining and Assuring Quality: Group 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent evaluation of services by diverse team |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
|
Prior established standards to govern provision of legal
systems (providers, cts & those who touch the justice system) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Need system to measure performance agst standards |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Same standards must apply to welfare offices, state
agencies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Need to train/educate providers & other system
participants in quality standards (e.g. law practice course to make it
practical) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Measure the efficiency of the service provided |
18 |
4 |
9 |
5 |
|
Understand better all the steps in certain legal processes
so to focus effort on quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Look at outputs, as well as outcomes |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Measure cases that don't get to court/appeals/tribunal for
state agency & why (e.g. is it because of status of litigant |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Measure complaints to Bd of Bar Overseers & why |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Understand what contributes to staff turnover w/in legal
providers & how that impacts on quality |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Understand & document impact of funding instability on
quality |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Finding ways to assess customer satisfaction (not just
surveys) despite barriers created by challenges of poverty, language, etc.
Go to community directly over time |
17 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
|
Use mandatory CLE to introduce concepts re: poverty etc.
to private bar |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Gather & report data on demographics of the providers
(language ability, race, cultural traditions, etc.) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Look at establish consistency in reporting requirements of
funders |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Reduce funder pressure to serve high volume of clients
which requires legal providers to emphasize #s by getting more $$ to do
quality work for all who need it |
6 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
Recognize impact of funding on quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Establish what an appropriate caseload should be relative
to area of practice |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Provide support to legal service providers in saying
"no, we can't take another case." |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Create/find new triage systems within the private bar |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Creating a better bridge betw/substance of the law &
the process of practicing law |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Assuring privacy & respect for legal aid clients in a
comfortable setting |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Find ways to instill passion & commitment to social
justice everywhere |
8 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining and Promoting Leadership for Justice, Group 7 |
|
|
|
|
Non-lawyers helping resolve problems w/o involving
attorneys or courts; leadership crossover b/t social &legal
organizations, i.e. attys on social justice organization boards |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
"211" line call for any kind of social
assistance. Make sure these resources, ie. providers, are included |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Educate people about availability of 211 resource |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Do people answering calls have enough information to
provide appropriate referrals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Find issues that sell & will resonate for people so
they want to promote access to justice * Social & economic benefit of
having a good justice system* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Response to call for help needs to be multi-layered and
respond to all needs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Providers collaborate w/social service providers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Holistic approach would
allow lawyers to specialize in legal issues. Educate attorneys on who else
can help w/other issues. Need more than lawyers as leaders. Interdisciplinary
leadership vehicles needed to be developed
so that can respond to inter-disciplinary approach. Need to reflect needs
of particular community. Bring all stakeholders together -- social
service, legal, business -- with idea that improved access to justice
leads to economic/social benefits for all. * |
9 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
|
Have conversations like this across state w/diverse
representatives of community |
5 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
|
Create forum for stakeholders around State to have
discussions like these to increase involvement & engender leadership |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Participants should reflect religious, cultural, etc
diversity of community and include non-attorneys, non-legal community
members |
4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
Promote & publicize shared vision of access to
justice, including economic & social benefits to society resulting
from a good justice system |
31 |
1 |
17 |
13 |
|
Change culture so that providing legal services more
desirable for students, attorneys, for example, partners consistently
participating in delivering access to justice and encouraging newer
attorneys to do same (applies to all disciplines). |
20 |
1 |
14 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total participants in category: |
94 |
12 |
48 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* full text includes: To overcome religious/cultural
biases in our society, include religious leaders in the process. Involve
them as leaders too. Engage wide range of institutions --business, legal,
social service. Firm & business leadership set tone for civic
mindfulness. Reward & acknowledge "new" attorneys civic
involvement. Needs to be firm culture & example set by firm
leadership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|